Is it any good? Let me tell you a story. At the screening I attended I was surprised to find
that my fellow patrons included a hyena, a zebra, an orang-utan and a tiger. The
hyena behaved badly throughout, laughing at the film and making noise
constantly. The zebra was mostly quiet, but whinnyed loudly at appropriate
moments. The orang-utan hardly moved, but regarded the action onscreen with
something approaching reverence, only turning to balefully regard the hyena at
times. The tiger, meanwhile, was transfixed by the absolutely beautiful visuals
and astounding CGI, but less taken with the story, yawning widely on occasion,
licking its paws clean, and left at the end relatively unmoved by the whole
experience. If you want another version of this review, I could tell it, but perhaps you prefer
this one?
I don’t trust you. What do others think?
You find the above story a bit unbelievable? Well, let me give you a more
acceptable version which reflects the general consensus. Few have quibbled with
the technical prowess on display here, with uniform praise for the beautiful
visuals. In particular, the CGI for the animal scenes is astonishingly good. So
lifelike is the tiger that Lee was forced to present digital evidence to the appropriate
authorities to prove it wasn’t a real tiger that was mistreated during filming
of some scenes. It fully deserves to sweep the technical awards at the Oscars. However,
the reception to the spiritual aspects of the story has been variable. As with
the book, some find it a wonderful celebration of faith and God, in whatever
form he is worshipped. Others find it a rather superficial exploration of
religious themes and dismiss it as a rather overrated shaggy dog tale.
Naturally, regardless of opinion, ratings of 3.14 out of 5 have been legion. So
that’s what other people think. Now, which of the reviews do you prefer?
No comments:
Post a Comment